ARIZONA Legislative District 11
Republican Committee

2026 GOLDEN TICKET

PHOENIX ELEMENTARY
SUANNE EDMISTON                          DAMIAN SANDOVAL

PHOENIX UNION WARD 2
JOE DAILEY

ROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY                (WRITE IN)
JANELLE WOOD

PHOENIX CITY COUNCIL                DISTRICT 8
FRANK ABASCIANO

PLEASE VOTE NO ON ALL BONDS AND BUDGET OVERRIDES

PROPOSITION 141 – PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO TAXATION

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of amending the Arizona Constitution to prohibit: (1) taxes or fees based on motor vehicle miles traveled; and (2) laws or rules that monitor or limit motor vehicle miles traveled without consent. These prohibitions do not apply in certain instances to interstate commercial vehicles or to vehicles owned by the state or local governments.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current constitutional language related to taxation.

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 142 – PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT AND DISCRIMINATION

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of amending the Arizona Constitution’s current prohibition against preferential treatment or  discrimination by the state based on race, ethnicity, or other classes, to specifically prohibit: (1) compelling individuals to support preferential treatment or discrimination based on race or ethnicity as a condition of education, employment, or contract opportunities; (2) spending public money on positions in public education responsible for promoting preferential treatment or discrimination based on race or ethnicity; and (3) implementing disciplinary practices that treat students or
employees differently based on race or ethnicity. Prohibited conduct includes requiring or asking an applicant, employee, student, or contractor to provide a statement in support of race-based diversity, equity, and inclusion beyond upholding the federal Equal Protection Clause or asking such a person to discuss the person’s race or ethnicity or experience with others’ race or ethnicity. The amendment contains certain exceptions for health services, legal, and other reasons.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current prohibition in the Arizona Constitution against preferential treatment or discrimination by the state based on race, ethnicity, or other classes.

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 144 – PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO ELECTION REQUIREMENTS

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of amending the Arizona Constitution to: (1) require voters to show proof of identity when  Voting in each election, including when voting by mail; (2) changing existing proof of identity requirements to limit acceptable documentation to government-issued ID; (3) require election officials to provide all voters the option to have their ballot tabulated at their voting location on election day; (4) prohibit foreign nationals from contributing or spending to influence
elections in Arizona and prohibit anyone from knowingly accepting such contributions, similar to prohibitions that already exist in federal law; (5) create a new standard for judicial review of election laws under the Arizona Constitution, which may make it harder to challenge election laws; and (6) require the legislature to appropriate money necessary to implement these provisions.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining current constitutional provisions governing elections

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 316 – REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO MUNICIPAL TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of: (1) retroactively prohibiting local governments from adopting or increasing a tax on groceries from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2027; and (2) after that time, prohibiting local governments from adopting or increasing a tax on groceries without voter approval and limiting any new or increased tax to a maximum rate of 2%.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current laws relating to local government taxation.

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 317 – REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of: (1) declaring drug cartels as terrorist organizations and directing the Arizona
Department of Homeland Security to do everything in its authority to address threats posed by drug cartels; (2) defining “drug cartel” to mean an ongoing formal or informal association of persons engaged in human smuggling, drug trafficking, or any act defined as terrorism under Arizona law; and (3) clarifying that this measure does not support an alien’s asylum claim.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current laws relating to terrorism and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 318 – REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO STUDENT ATHLETICS

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of: (1) requiring private schools, public schools, and athletic associations to designate every athletic team as male, female, or coed/mixed based on sex and to prevent males from
joining female teams; existing law imposes this requirement only on public schools and those competing against them; (2) prohibiting schools and athletic associations from authorizing anyone to use private spaces (such as restrooms) not designated for that individual’s sex; (3) defining “sex” as an individual’s biological status as male or female as recorded at birth on an original birth certificate; and (4) authorizing athletes to sue schools and athletic associations that knowingly violate this law.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current laws relating to student athletics.

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 319 – REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO PHOTO ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of: (1) prohibiting state agencies and local governments from using photo enforcement systems to identify violators of traffic laws unless the agency or government contracts to use those systems by December 31, 2026; and (2) requiring local governments to obtain voter approval of existing photo enforcement systems at the next regular general election and every 10 years afterward to continue using photo enforcement systems.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current laws governing photo enforcement systems

VOTE YES

PROPOSITION 320 – REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGETS

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of: (1) requiring school districts with 7,500 or more students in any county or that operate in a county with 500,000 or more people to spend at least 60% of their operational spending on direct instructional expenses; (2) requiring the state Auditor General to define “operational spending” and “direct instructional expenses”; (3) requiring non-compliant school districts to gradually adjust their spending each year until they are in compliance; and (4) requiring the state Department of Education to reduce funding from the state Classroom Site Fund by 25% each year for non-compliant districts, subject to limited waivers that the state Superintendent of Public Instruction may authorize.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of maintaining the current laws governing school district budgets.

VOTE YES

JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT
Retain: LOPEZ IV, JOHN
VOTE YES

JUDGES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION 1
Retain: HILL, FOSTER ANNI
VOTE NO

Retain: JACOBS, ANDREW
VOTE NO

ALL OTHER APPEALS COURT JUDGES
VOTE YES

JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT